Notes from conversation with Sasha Koustov re industrial partner support:
=========================================================================

- We must have a formal commitment from SciTec (our industrial partner)
to contribute real dollars or equivalent to project;
- We can't operate strictly on a fee-for-service basis with them; there
must be some element of risk of resources (i.e., investment of time,
resources, or money) into the project or the "partnership" isn't real,
isn't compliant with CSA requirements;
- JAK's proposal will include a letter from Bristol Aerospace committing
them to invest $100K, but in fact BA will get ~$1M for services
rendered; this is not what CSA wants;
- At least one proposal is being written from a "business-as-usual"
perspective regarding CSA's requirements, when it seems clear that CSA
does not want this approach at all;
- Nature of desirable/possible commitment from SciTec? Charge for
engineering services at cost, i.e., waive overhead? Establish 
scholarship(s) for involved graduate students? Other?
- My vision of process from now to ultimate goal:
  (a) SciTec invest staff time in proposal preparation (front money);
  (b) SciTec either invest actual dollars or waive certain remunerations
      in design/build/test of rocket experiment (seed money);
  (c) SciTec receive full-cost contract(s) to build satellite 
      experiment(s) (business-as-usual);
  (d) SciTec develop value-added ozone maps as commercial product and 
      make a bundle selling them to distribution channels (payoff!);
- Have to discuss nature and level of SciTec's commitment with Duane
Sniezek starting now, to ensure that agreed-on contribution is
meaningful and meets CSA requirements;
- Have to discuss SciTec's requirements for proposal with DS so I
understand how we have to write it;