Notes from conversation with EJL, 961009:

- for build phase, SciTec take on U. staff/students as employees;
- perhaps SciTec can use money to award scholarships to students - 
  possible tax advantages for them;
- try to cut a deal to use U. salary overhead to pay grad. students;
- U. administration will blanch when it's proposed - they don't
  understand what is required in the current and future environment;
- prepare a seminar for November 7: EJL gives 15-min preamble on overall
  purpose of exercise, and two project participants (I and one other)
  describe project and execution;
- need to come up with a catchy (and probably misleading) seminar title;
- seminar presented by David Steele and the Niteowls;
- EJL likes idea of creating artificial crunch 2 wks before Dec. 5 -
  locking doors and ordering in pizza, hashing out whole proposal while
  everyone's here, enough PCs for everyone to write;
- won't finish, will be exhausted, but will be far enough along to make
  final job manageable;
- after crunch, make whole document available to all students and tell
  them to finish their sections in light of the whole document;
- comments on other sections to be submitted to me in writing, but not
  applied to document text - that's my job;
- try to get student involvement finished by Dec. 5th so they can worry
  about other classes without this hanging over their heads;
- I must recognize that I won't understand the details in the same way
  as the students will - I don't have to;
- my job is to have the big picture in mind - see how changes in one
  area will impact other areas;